Forum Topics

TGT- CHR  20 min observation

Just my observation of 20 mins on the corner Firstly 7 cars and one pickup had to take quick decisive action turning right out of TGT and not entering the cycle lane. One car naturally took a wide turn at pace and took quick action to turn back in. Unfortunately, nothing serious happened as the motorbike that was originally behind ended beside the car and nearly take out. The conclusion is this. Only a matter of time before something happens and I don't give it long. The turn is naturally wide but the start of the cycle lane is set to far forward for correction Secondly, is the cycle lane going east to the west outside Barclays bank. They have the wands in place to mark the cycle lane from the lights pretty much up to the corner of Annandale avenue. This gives cyclists who ignore the red outside Barclays to carry on thinking they are safe because of the wands giving the impression the cycle lane continues. Unfortunately, one car coming down Annandale avenue at a legal pace because the road was clear so at a pace and crossing into TGT on a green missed a cyclist who had not stopped on the red going east to west. The conclusion is while the cyclist or cyclists must stop on red and i say that because many did not stop on red but majority did just in case one gets all touchy the continuation of the wands gives cyclists who don't stop a false sense of safety and traffic coming out of Annandale avenue are waiting for them. The wands past the lights up to Annandale avenue need to be removed. Thirdly I noticed the green man outside snappy snaps going south to north and visa versa are not counting down and the time to cross seems to have gone down slightly. Some pedestrian seems to be caught out more than before The total conclusion is TGT, CHR and Annandale avenue will have accidents in time, it is just a case of when

Julian Pavey ● 2148d112 Comments ● 2139d

Thames Road access REVISED

Sorry I missed the first part of Hounslow's reply in my previous posting.Again, can someone please explain it to me. "In response to the question you raised regarding the time limit for Thames road, At the current time the Council does not hold the information requested regarding the time limit. However, should at any time the Council hold such information then it is likely that we would treat that information as exempt under Section 31 (2) (c) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 as the timing element is in place to facilitate and enable the enforcement of a restriction. Further, releasing the pre-determined timings relating to the linked-cameras for this scheme is likely to start to dilute the effectiveness of the measure over time as there is a chance this information would become general knowledge. This in turn would likely undermine the purpose of the scheme which is to prevent through traffic.Details can be found in the FOI guidance here: https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1207/law-enforcement-foi-section-31.pdf . There is no intention to issue penalty charge notices for legitimate access journeys. The penalty in question is not the time limit, but the purpose of the journey i.e. is it for access (permitted) or non-access (not permitted) purposes.  These type of access-only schemes are being trialled as part of Streetspace and we will be reviewing ways in which they can be made clearer and more effective. Residents feedback on this will be very important."

Jeffrey Cope ● 2156d44 Comments ● 2141d