Forum Topic

First of all, a genuine thank you to everyone who has shared their thoughts and shown their support — we truly appreciate it 💛
Actually, this is what happened when they came in just before closing:
A couple arrived — not as customers to buy anything. They came just before closing, and it felt like they were there to cause trouble, not to do business. They asked directly for the manager or owner. When I spoke with them, the very first thing said was: "My daughter (name removed) worked here last year in the summer. She did a six‑hour shift and it was free labour."
I had to stop her straight away because "free labour" is such an offensive and unfair thing to say — it is not who we are, and it is not how we operate. I told them we do not do that here at all.
From there, the conversation became heated very quickly. Both of them kept telling me what I should do, how I should run my business — trying to teach me how to do things, saying "next time do this, next time do that". They also mentioned a couple of times about "customer service" — but they were not customers. They didn’t buy anything at all. They came with a grievance about something from a year ago, not as people here to buy our cake or our service.

Our trial shifts are never six hours long. They are always short — 2 to 3 hours maximum — and it is clearly explained before anyone starts that they are unpaid. This is so we can both see if we are a good fit — for the candidate as much as for us. We provide a meal and drink as a thank you for their time. This is not "free labour" — it is a mutual opportunity.
I also want to be clear: after checking with all my current staff and our records, no one recognises the name (name removed), nor do we have any clear memory or record of this person attending a trial shift, or anyone returning to ask about a role. We have no knowledge of the visits described, or of any promise to call back.
This relates to something said to be about a year ago. Many of our summer team are students who join us for the season and then move on. We simply cannot track down every former team member from that long ago to verify details — and no concern was raised at the time, or at any point since, until now.
We treat everyone fairly, pay our staff correctly, and take great care with young people starting out. If there was a genuine concern, we would always want to speak calmly and directly — but that was not how this went.
Thank you again to everyone for your kindness and support. We are proud of our business and our team, and we love being part of this community.
Thank you.

Homayoun ● 26d

Is it me, or is Roland swinging wildly between moods?He goes from "idiot" to hugs and kisses in a heartbeat. This after multiple instances elsewhere of being abusive particularly toward women. It's clear he hasn't run a public-facing business on a high street. As someone who has for nearly two decades, I can confirm he is correct the variety of people is mind-boggling. I can also confirm when people don't get their way for whatever reason it is all too common for them to post something negative online, dare I say vindictive, for no reason other than revenge. To do damage to the establishment (Roland, this is what's called reputational damage). My favorite examples are when people ask for favors (donations even) and then post something negative about quality, cost, service, owner/staff temperament, etc. All those things that come with a transaction. But the transaction never occurred. So a spurious claim to say the least. Given Yasmeen's choice to come to the forum a year after the incident and then disappear when the tide isn't in her favor is all a bit curious. I get this is Mama Bear protecting Baby Bear. Any parent would have that reflex. Many, many times we've accommodated local kids for placement, trails, summer gigs, etc. I can count on one hand without the thumb the number of times those kids have been functional in a public business setting. Is it really up to us to mention they shouldn't wear pajamas or sweat pants or gym shorts or look at their phones the whole time? To teach them what initiative is? To teach them what courtesy is? How to start an interaction with a customer? Follow through? Think? Plan? Be proactive? On many occasions others on this forum have mentioned how schools seem to fail the kids by preparing them for what lies beyond the classroom. It isn't just the schools. This example from Yasmeen is what often pops into my head. With no disrespect whatsoever, there does exist the possibility that, perhaps, the daughter in question wasn't ready for the trial at all. And that's not the fault of the business. If that were to be the case, you then have to put yourself in the owner's shoes and ask yourself, knowing how social media can be, would you tell the parent straight up their child simply wasn't up to it, or would you possibly bob and weave? Again, I'm not saying that's what happened here, but it is very much part of the dynamic at play.

David Lesniak ● 25d